I have to admit I have a natural aversion to signing petitions. What it comes down to is that usually you have to take a random stranger's word that your name, address, and signature are going to be used for what they say they are. In what other scenario would you do that?
Case in point: couple of guys parked outside Prego (17th and Corcoran) this weekend, collecting signatures. I scooted by them so I could get in and buy a sandwich without being hit up for whatever it was they wanted, and then I was able to sit on the sidewalk terrace and watch them as I ate my lunch.
Their pitch to passers-by was "do you want to sign a petition calling for more DC lottery money to go to public schools?" Sounds good, right? A lot of people stopped and signed without wanting to know any more than that. But a few more knowledgeable people asked more detailed questions, which led to a more complicated story having to do with legalized gambling in southeast, and I got the distinct impression that in fact, that might be what this petition was about. Seemed a little disingenous to me.
Then a guy who apparently really knows what's going on asked one of the signature-collectors if he was from DC, and the guy told him no, at which point the guy lectured him and said that an earlier intiative had been thrown out for just that reason. (When I got home I looked it up on Washingtonpost.com and DCist and he was right: more details
here and
here.) So what we actually had going on there was not an effort to support public schools, but what looked like an incredibly dishonest effort to collect signatures for legalized gambling.
A few other observations: one of the signature collectors, the one from out of town, stopped his efforts for a good 20 minutes to hit on a woman who'd just given her name and address to him upon signing. Flattered by the attention, she told him all about the non-profit she worked at, impressed that she thought she'd met another do-gooder, rather than an out-of-town hack out earning $2 a signature from some faceless corporate entity.
It was funny to see some of the responses of people who didn't want to sign: many of them just stormed by without acknowledging them; a number of people said they weren't from DC, and in a few cases that seemed to probably not be true; and one woman said "I'm late for my yoga class." A variety of other lame excuses were offered up, and the signature collectors jokingly argued with many of them, but when a couple of women yelled at them "we're totally against gambling" they didn't even try to offer a response. Conversely, a homeless guy wanted to sign, and they tried to put him off with questions about his fixed address, but finally let him sign it.
In retrospect, a good question to ask such people would be "who hired you to do this?" And the moral of the story here definitely is: be careful what you sign. It is amazing to see how many people on 17th Street this weekend signed a petition for legalized gambling thinking they were helping kids.